news | gracchusdixit

September 7, 2026

The Gangster-in-Chief

In the ten, excruciatingly long years Donald Trump has loomed over our public life like an oppressive monsoon cloud that refuses to break, there have been countless attempts to analyze his strange personality and even stranger cult-like appeal. These attempts have ranged all over the intellectual map, from high-minded philosophizing to low-brow psychologizing.

The psycho-analyzers ask: Did Donald Trump have a tortured childhood? Was he deprived of his mother’s love? Did he grow up in the shadow of a domineering father? Is he an aggrieved parvenue from Queens who can’t abide the fact that he will never, ever, be accepted by New York’s old-money establishment? Is he, as a result of all that, an insecure narcissist, a sociopath, or even a psychopath?

The philosophizers wonder: Is Trump the avatar of some inscrutable but deep-seated anger on the part of the body politic? Is he the present-day voice of Richard Nixon’s “silent majority,” the purportedly ignored and perpetually aggrieved denizens of “fly-over country,” who long to thumb their noses at coastal elites? Is he, for Evangelical Christians, the promised one, god’s imperfect but long-awaited instrument, who will at last salve their scabrous itch to scrub the country of its wickedness?

For all I know, Donald Trump may, to one degree or another, be all of these things—or none of them.

In the end, however, none of that really matters, for neither Trump himself nor the political pathology he embodies requires even a dollop of sophisticated analysis.

The simple, disagreeable truth is that the current President of the United States is a gangster, the son of a gangster, the father and father-in-law of gangsters, and the godfather of a political administration populated by gangsters. He is, to be sure, a stupendously low-brow and stupid gangster, but he is a gangster nonetheless. Once you recognize and accept this truth, all else falls into place.

What motivates all gangsters is the urge to make a quick buck. This, it should be said, is the same urge that motivates capitalists. The difference, in theory, at least, is that capitalists scratch their greedy itch legally, whereas gangsters couldn’t care less about the niceties of the law and not infrequently take perverse pleasure in breaking it. In Donald Trump’s case, this is a distinction without a difference, because, for him, “the law” is merely a blunt instrument to be used when it suits his purpose and discarded when it does not.

As anyone who has been to the movies can tell you, the fundamental way gangsters make their money is by extortion, a.k.a., “protection”. The business model is straightforward: pay me or I break your legs, torch your business, and kill your family. Protection isn’t complicated; it requires no capital investment or special managerial skill; and best of all, the risk is low, because, out of sheer terror, few of its victims are likely to complain, let alone resist. The best way to understand the Trump presidency, therefore, is to see it as a “protection racket” on a global scale.

From his first day in office, Donald Trump exploited the power of the presidency—or the mere threat of its use—to extort money from just about everyone: domestic and international corporations, foreign countries, wealthy institutions and individuals, and, increasingly, American taxpayers. None of this ever had anything to do with “making America great again;” still less did it spring from a coherent political ideology. Its sole purpose was—and is—to make Donald Trump as rich as possible.

The same purpose motivates the gang of sycophants and criminals who surround him:

Howard Lutnick, Trump’s oily Secretary of Commerce and one-time intimate of Jeffrey Epstein, is up to his waders in the cryptocurrency industry he supposedly regulates, from which not only Lutnick but Trump and his smarmy offspring are reaping millions.

Scott Bessent, Trump’s prissily condescending Secretary of the Treasury, flouted the law by taking more than a year to divest himself of blatant financial conflicts of interest, and even now, we have only his word that he has done so. All the while he was hemming and hawing, he was spending billions of taxpayer dollars to prop up countries and industries that enriched himself and his Wall Street pals.

Stephen Miller, Trump’s Deputy Chief-of-Staff (and a dead-ringer for Adolph Eichmann) owns a chunk of stock in Palantir, a murky tech company that gets much of its revenue from contracts with the very government agencies Miller uses to terrorize immigrants as well as the intelligence services of the genocidal Israeli state.

Topping it all off is Jared Kushner, Trump’s son-in-law, who has taken corrupt double-dealing to a level that would stagger the robber barons of the Gilded Age. Though Kushner occupies no official government position, isn’t qualified to do so, and has absolutely no idea what he is doing, his gangster father-in-law has given him the keys to the diplomatic kingdom. Needless to say, young Jared is taking full advantage of the gift and the grift.

Given this cornucopia of corruption and criminality, one must ask why Americans voted to send a gangster like Donald Trump to the White House in the first place—not once, but twice—and why one out of three Americans continue to support him even as he makes their lives more miserable by the day.

The unsettling answer is that Americans have always had a soft spot for gangsters. From Billy the Kid to Bonnie & Clyde, from John Dillinger to Don Corleone, the popular culture of the United States has for decades depicted criminals, not as the thieves, thugs, and brutal murderers they generally are, but as romantic Robin Hoods who stand up for “the little guy”. In the depths of the Great Depression, millions of down-and-out Americans poured into movie theaters to plunk down the few pennies they possessed to watch the likes of Jimmy Cagney and Humphrey Bogart, George Raft and Edward G. Robinson strut across the screen, brandishing guns, robbing banks, selling bootlegged whiskey and bathtub gin, and thumbing their noses at “polite society”.

It is no different with Donald Trump, who has always been simultaneously a gangster and an entertainer, posing as a faux Robin Hood. In the countless “rallies” he used to hold and has now all but abandoned out of the fear that he might hooted off the stage, he riled up his adoring, angry fans with crude, amusing take-downs of the “elites”. At one of those rallies, he even declared: “I am your retribution”.

Those antics worked for years and got him elected twice. But the entertainment value is running out of gas, much like the low-rent reality TV show that launched Trump’s political career in the first place. That show, The Apprentice, was a ratings hit for a couple of years, then went into a steep decline, was rescued for a few years more by a “reboot,” and finally died a natural death when it ran out of resurrectional tricks. The trajectory of The Apprentice is eerily similar to that of Donald Trump’s presidency.

When the curtain finally comes down on the Trump presidency, little will remain but the moral, political, and economic bankruptcy of a gangster…and of an entire nation. Reality will finally set in, not only for him, but for us.

February 23, 2025

It’s Not Him, It’s Us

Donald J. Trump—a convicted felon, sexual abuser, and serial adulterer—has been President of the United States for little more than a month, yet in that time he has inflicted decades worth of damage on American democracy. The first time he occupied the White House, his presidency was so chaotic, incompetent, and unprepared, that four years later he was booted out of office, losing by seven million votes to the already doddering Joe Biden, one of the least inspiring presidential candidates in American history. This time, however, Trump and his henchmen may be no less chaotic and incompetent, but they are infinitely better prepared, and they moving swiftly to impose what can only be described as a revolutionary reign of terror on the nation.

On his first day in office, our new “fearless leader” unleashed a torrent of executive orders that violate the constitution, make a mockery of the law, and upend the fragile social and cultural balance that has held our fissiparous and centrifugal nation together for generations. In the days since, he has taken steps to impose his absolute control on the military and law enforcement, to wrest the power of the purse from Congress, and to cow the media into subservient silence. All but one of his cabinet nominees —most of whom are utterly unqualified, ethically questionable, or both—have been confirmed. And finally, Trump’s unelected doppelgänger, Elon Musk, has been let loose on the federal government, with the explicit purpose of destroying as much of it as he can.

If Trump is the sociopath that he so obviously is, then Musk qualifies as a psychopath, whose monstrous ego feeds on delusions of grandeur, is blind to his own failings, and takes pleasure in the pain and suffering of his fellow human beings. Because this latter-day Rumpelstiltskin is the world’s richest man—thanks in large part to the largess of the federal government—money-worshipping Republicans have decided that Musk is to Trump what St. Peter was to Christ, the rock on which his church was built.

As horrific as all this is, worse—much worse—is sure to come. To anyone who once dismissed Donald Trump’s inflammatory rhetoric as mere bluster or pooh-poohed the deadly seriousness of his vengeful agenda in the vain hope that he didn’t really mean it, the only thing I can say is this: It is time to wake up and shed your illusions about both the man and his malignant mission.

It is also time to shed another illusion, i.e., the always preposterous fiction that the United States of America is a morally exceptional nation and that Americans are a uniquely decent people in a world otherwise filled with sin and woe. If Americans had even a shred of decency, they would be recoiling in horror, disbelief, and outrage in the face of Trump’s cruelty. And some of them are. Most, however, seem to like what they see. Indeed, Donald Trump’s approval ratings are higher than they have ever been, and one recent poll found that, if the 2024 election were rerun today, he would win, not by the slim plurality of last November, but by a decisive majority.

Just days after that November election, the Governor of Michigan, who is, or was, frequently touted as one of the Democratic Party’s rising stars, said this:

As we move forward, let’s remember that we are a nation of good, kind people that have more in common with each other than not. Finally, let’s root for the success of the new administration and keep working together to get things done.

I have no idea whether these sentiments were sincerely meant or merely a political calculation. What I do know is that they are fatuous, false, and morally repugnant.

A “nation of good, kind people” would not allow 30 percent of its population to own more guns than automobiles, with the result that 20 percent of all the murders in the world occur in the United States and more American children are killed by guns than by any plague or disease.

A “nation of good, kind people” would not tolerate, let alone applaud, the prospect of millions of hapless immigrants being rounded up, locked away in concentration camps, and deported to God-knows-where, simply for committing the spurious “crime” of seeking a better life for themselves and their families.

A “nation of good, kind people” would not abide the denial of critical medical care to desperate women, whose only wish is to end pregnancies they never asked for, let alone stand by as all too many of them die for want of that care.

A “nation of good, kind people” would not turn a blind eye to the persecution, and soon perhaps the prosecution, of gay and transgender Americans, whose only “sin” is a desire to be the people they believe themselves to be.

The assertion that we are a “nation of good, kind people” is a travesty. The exhortation to “root for the success of the new administration” in the name of “getting things done” is far worse. This sort of cheerleading nonsense is more than naive, it is a grotesque failure of moral and historical imagination. Most of all, it is a failure to see the “American people” for what they are and always have been: insular and ignorant, bigoted and backward, self-centered and all too frequently cruel. Rooting for the success of the Trump administration is tantamount to cheering on Adolf Hitler’s plan to exterminate the Jews, Slavs, Gypsies, and other “inferior” beings of Europe.

H. L. Mencken, the most acerbic observer of the American scene who ever put pen to paper, once wrote:

On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart’s desire at last, and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron.

Little did even the quintessentially cynical Mencken imagine that the White House would someday be adorned, not merely by a “downright moron,” but by a convicted criminal and a psychological freak. Say what you will about the man, Donald Trump has always made his freakish and criminal intentions clear. That 77 million Americans voted for him nonetheless is a stain upon this country and its people that can never be erased.

February 21, 2024

The Cry-Wolf “Crisis at the Border”

To hear Donald Trump and his sycophantic enablers tell the tale, the United States of America is being overwhelmed by a tsunami of illegal immigrants who pose an existential threat, not only to this country, but to “civilization” itself. Bellowing in Hitlerian terms that these desperate people are “vermin poisoning the blood of our country,” Trump has declared his intention, if he regains the White House ten months from now, to use the military to expel them from the country or to lock them away in what used to be called “concentration camps”.

Far from alienating voters, this vicious rhetoric has thus far served Trump well. In Iowa, where he clobbered the pathetic remaining candidates for the Republican presidential nomination, the number one issue was immigration. Even in New Hampshire, where one might have expected a more rational response, angry fantasies about the dangers of immigration loomed large. All this, despite the fact that these small and comparatively isolated states are among the most lily-white in the nation, in which immigrants are only slightly less rare than unicorns and just about as dangerous.

If Trump succeeds in defeating Joe Biden this November—the horrific possibility of which seems likelier by the day—the proximate cause will surely be America’s hysterical overreaction to the so-called “crisis at the border”.

As if that prospect weren’t depressing enough, Joe Biden himself has all but abandoned his promise to bring about a more humane immigration regime, in effect kowtowing to Trump’s preposterous and vicious claims. It would seem that the geriatric establishment in charge of the Democratic Party is terrified that if their geriatric president dared to tell the American people the truth, both he and they would soon be out of work.

And what is the truth?

That truth is that the “crisis at the border” is a hoax conjured up to serve the demagogic purposes of a nihilistic Republican Party that has no political program beyond slavishly supporting Donald Trump, without regard for facts or evidence, common sense or common decency.

The truth is that millions of helpless yet hopeful people yearn to immigrate to the United States legally, as they have for generations, but we make it all but impossible for them to do so, not because they pose any sort of threat but, rather, because we refuse to let them in. Fewer than 15 percent of Americans were born outside this country. In neighboring Canada, the number is 21 percent. Indeed, the number of immigrants in this country, as a share of our total population, is close to an all-time low, ranking us 56th in the world.

The truth is that, far from being a land that welcomes the “huddled masses yearning to be free,” our country is deeply xenophobic. Not only do we prevent immigrants from entering our country legally, we make it even harder for them to become citizens. Still worse, we turn our backs on those seeking asylum from the chaos and violence created by our very own political and economic misdeeds: countless CIA coups against democratically elected governments, innumerable assassinations of left-leaning politicians, and the utterly immoral practice of propping up right-wing dictators whose only virtue is their willingness to do the bidding of our nation’s biggest corporations.

The ultimate truth is that the “crisis at the border” is not caused by desperate immigrants and refugees trying to get in; it is caused by the cruel and perverse efforts of the United States to keep them out.

No amount of truth, however, is or will ever be enough to prevent right-wing fear-mongers from demonizing immigrants and peddling outrageous lies to justify their authoritarian purposes. To cite but one example, a “senior research fellow” at the Heritage Foundation named Robert Rector, posing as an expert on immigration, recently testified before Congress. Whatever expertise Mr. Rector may or may not possess, the Heritage Foundation is little more than a front for the anti-democratic agenda of the right-wing billionaires who control the Republican Party and have saddled us with the conservative majority now in charge of the Supreme Court. It was therefore not surprising that Mr. Rector’s testimony was riddled with falsehoods and misrepresentations. Here is one of the most egregious:

An extensive study by the National Academies of Science (NAS), “The Economic and Fiscal Consequences of Immigration,”…confirms that immigrants with low levels of education impose large fiscal burdens on U.S. taxpayers.

And here is the actual text of the study Rector cites:

“The Economic and Fiscal Consequences of Immigration” finds that the long-term impact of immigration on the wages and employment of native-born workers overall is very small…This report concludes that immigration has an overall positive impact on long-run economic growth in the U.S.

From the very first day Europeans set foot on the North American continent, searching for a better life, hoping to escape the political, social, and economic tyrannies that oppressed them at home, one wave of immigration after another has enlarged and enriched the nation. What would this country be without the millions of Irish, Italian, German, Jewish, Dutch, and Scandinavian immigrants who poured into this country in the 19th and early 20th centuries? Why do we imagine that the contributions of Spanish-speaking or Asian immigrants will be any less?

The terrible truth is that, throughout the tortured history of our nation, the immigrants who were lucky enough to get here first have routinely demonized those who followed. It wasn’t that long ago when the high-and-mighty descendants of the English Protestants who settled New England were decrying the arrival of Catholic immigrants from famine-ridden Ireland and impoverished Italy, Jewish refugees from the pogroms of Imperial Russia, or Poles and Slavs striving to escape centuries of oppression, war, and rapine. The irony is that the descendants of those once despised and downtrodden immigrants now eagerly embrace the brutalizing demagoguery of Donald Trump, because the immigrants he demonizes have brown or black skins and speak Spanish, Chinese, or Hindi.

The anodyne and shopworn cliché that the United States is “a nation of immigrants” misses the point. The point is that, without immigrants, the United States would not exist at all. Without a steady influx of immigrants, the population of the United States would age and wither on the vine, like the populations of so many European countries. Far from being a drain on our economy or a threat to our culture, immigrants are, as they have always been, the very lifeblood of the nation.